Netherlands · NL
Netherlands accessibility law: Tijdelijk Besluit + EAA Wet explained
The Netherlands runs one of the most active public-sector accessibility programmes in the EU through Logius / Digitoegankelijk. The EAA transposition extends similar obligations to consumer-facing services.
- Primary law
- Tijdelijk besluit digitale toegankelijkheid overheid
- In force from
- 28 June 2025
- Standard
- WCAG 2.1 Level AA via EN 301 549
- Enforcement
- Logius (public sector) and ACM (private sector)
Who has to comply
Public-sector since 2018 via Tijdelijk Besluit; private-sector under the Dutch EAA Implementatiewet from 28 June 2025.
The Netherlands is a highly digitised, English-comfortable market that many international sellers use as a logistics and e-commerce hub, so cross-border exposure is high. Under the Dutch EAA Implementatiewet, a foreign store selling to Dutch consumers is covered on the country-of-consumption basis, and the Dutch regime is notable for penalties reaching up to 10% of annual turnover for repeat offenders, one of the steeper multipliers in the EU. Dutch consumers are accustomed to the Digitoegankelijk statement, so an absent or vague conformance declaration stands out quickly.
What the law actually requires
The technical baseline is WCAG 2.1 Level AA via EN 301 549. EN 301 549 references WCAG 2.1 Level AA in full and adds a few requirements specific to mobile apps and documents. Beyond the technical bar, Netherlands requires the following operational items, which auditors check first because they are simple to verify:
EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA
Public accessibility statement using the Digitoegankelijk template
Conformance status disclosed (full / partial / non-conformant)
Penalties and how enforcement actually works
Up to 10% of annual turnover for repeat offenders.
The Netherlands runs a split model: Logius / Digitoegankelijk drives the mature public-sector monitoring programme, while the ACM (Authority for Consumers and Markets) handles private-sector consumer enforcement. The Dutch approach leans on transparency and status disclosure — covered services are expected to publish whether they are fully, partially or non-conformant, with a remediation plan for anything less than full. Persistent partial-conformance status without visible progress is precisely what invites ACM attention, so the declared status is treated as an enforcement signal, not a formality.
Most enforcement starts with a complaint or a routine sweep. The first signal is usually a written notice giving you 30–60 days to remediate before fines kick in.
Practical first steps for a Netherlands site
If you are starting now and want to land before enforcement, run an automated audit, fix the high-impact issues (contrast, labels, keyboard, focus), publish an accessibility statement, and set up a feedback inbox. That sequence covers 80% of what auditors look for in a first sweep.
Run a baseline scan to know your current score
Fix critical and serious issues in priority order — these are the ones cited in complaints
Publish a public accessibility statement on a stable URL (Netherlands regulators expect this discoverable)
Add a feedback channel and answer within the country-specified window
Re-scan after every major release; track regressions
Frequently asked questions
Is partial conformance acceptable?
It is acceptable to declare partial conformance with a remediation plan, but full conformance is the legal target. Persistent partial status invites enforcement.
Accessibility law in nearby jurisdictions
Find every accessibility issue on your site in 60 seconds.
Free public scan. No card. AI-generated fixes for every issue we find.